Worked example

Follow a site from boundary to issued report.

This is an illustrative composite example designed to show the Site Reports Direct process. It uses genuine UK base mapping, but the example findings are not an assessment of the mapped property.

01Boundary-led02Evidence explained03Consultant conclusion
From site to report

See what happens at each stage.

The important distinction is between finding data and interpreting what it means for the site and proposed use.

1Illustrative mapped boundary

Boundary selected

The customer defines the land being assessed. That geometry stays attached to the instruction.

2Illustrative historical mapping

Historical maps reviewed

Dated mapping is compared to identify material changes and former uses around the site.

3Illustrative environmental context

Environmental context reviewed

Relevant environmental evidence is considered spatially in relation to the selected boundary.

4
Illustrative findings
  • Former developed land indicated historically
  • Water environment considered nearby
  • Ground conditions require contextual review
  • No single dataset determines the conclusion

Material findings identified

The report separates what is potentially significant from what has simply been recorded.

5
Consultant viewFurther targeted investigation may be proportionateExample wording only

Consultant recommendation

The reviewer explains why a finding matters and what should happen next.

6Illustrative professional report

Report issued

A controlled PDF connects the site, evidence, conclusions, limitations and recommendations.

What changes between free and professional

The free screening finds signals. The report resolves the decision context.

Free screening

Useful first look

Environmental indicators
Historical context
Water sensitivity
Mining context

Good for understanding whether anything obvious deserves attention and for choosing a next step.

VS
Professional report

Decision-ready interpretation

  • Deeper historical review and chronology
  • Environmental setting assessed together
  • Potential source–pathway–receptor linkages considered where relevant
  • Limitations stated explicitly
  • Proportionate recommendations
  • Professional review and controlled issue
Illustrative findings

How the report turns observations into useful statements.

Former land use

Historical mapping can indicate activities or development that warrant closer consideration.

Evidence

Nearby receptors

The significance of a record depends on its location, nature and plausible relationship to the site.

Context

Water environment

Surface water, groundwater and flood context may influence sensitivity and potential pathways.

Setting

Mining legacy

Where relevant, coal-mining legacy is assessed through the dedicated CMRA scope rather than assumed from a generic screen.

Specialist scope

Recommended next step

The consultant recommendation reflects the combined evidence and project context, not one isolated data point.

Judgement
What the finished report contains

Structured so the reasoning is easy to follow.

The exact sections vary by product, but a professional report is designed to connect evidence, interpretation and recommendations in a controlled document.

Executive summarySite details & boundaryHistorical chronologyEnvironmental settingRisk assessmentRecommendationsData sources & methodologyAppendices

See what the process shows for your site.

Define your boundary, run the free preliminary screening and decide whether a professional report is the right next step.